It improves pigment and overall appearance. It doesn't tighten more than RF microneedling alone — and that distinction is the difference between a combination worth paying for and one you're being sold.
Adding a 1927nm thulium laser to RF microneedling improves pigmentation and overall appearance without meaningfully increasing downtime.
It does not increase tightening. Comparative work found similar lower-face and neck tightening whether RF was performed alone or combined with the laser.
So the combination is worth it if you have laxity and pigment together. If you only have one of those, you're paying for a device that isn't treating your problem.
These treat entirely different depths, which is both why combining them makes sense and why the benefit shows up where it does.
Delivers energy into the dermis to stimulate collagen. Improves laxity and texture. Does relatively little for surface discolouration.
Absorbed so strongly by water that it stays in the epidermis. Treats surface pigment and dullness. Reaches nothing deep.
Stack them and you're treating two layers in one session — which is why overall appearance improves even though the tightening component doesn't change.
The improvement is real. It just isn't the improvement most people assume they're buying.
This is the version you'll hear, because tightening is what people come in asking for and combination pricing is easier to justify against it.
But when RF microneedling with thulium was compared against RF microneedling alone, both produced similar lower-face and neck tightening. The difference was in pigmentation and overall appearance.
That's still a reason to combine them for the right patient. It just isn't a reason to expect a firmer result — and if the laxity is what's bothering you, adding a superficial laser doesn't move that number.
What's good: prospective, with blinded evaluation, which removes a lot of the wishful thinking that plagues aesthetic outcome reporting.
What isn't: the sample was small, and the comparison group was a previously treated cohort rather than patients randomised at the same time. That leaves room for differences between the groups that have nothing to do with the treatment.
The direction of the finding is credible. The precise size of the benefit is less certain, and anyone quoting a specific percentage improvement from this is overstating what the design supports.
Both are non-ablative, so neither removes tissue and recovery stays in the range of a few days rather than the week or more ablative resurfacing requires. Two treatments in one session does mean more total inflammation, so settings are adjusted rather than simply stacked at full strength.
RF microneedling improves laxity modestly and reliably. Where laxity is mild, that can genuinely be enough.
Where skin is loose enough to pinch into a distinct fold, no non-surgical device closes that gap — not RF, not the combination, not any number of sessions. That's a surgical problem, and being told so is cheaper than finding out at session four.
Combination treatments are easy to sell because two devices sounds better than one. This particular pairing is worth doing — but for pigment, not for tightening, and someone who came in wanting a firmer jawline shouldn't be paying extra for a laser that won't affect it. Where both problems are present it's a good use of a single session. Where they aren't, the honest answer is to do one thing properly.
Does adding thulium to RF microneedling tighten more?
No, and this is the part worth being clear about. Comparative work has found similar lower-face and neck tightening whether RF microneedling was performed alone or combined with a 1927nm thulium laser. What the combination added was improvement in pigmentation and overall appearance. If a practice presents the laser as increasing how much the treatment tightens, they are describing something the evidence does not currently support.
What does the combination actually add?
Pigment and surface quality. Radiofrequency microneedling works in the dermis and does relatively little for surface discolouration. A 1927nm thulium laser stays in the epidermis and treats exactly that — sun damage, uneven tone, dullness. Combining them addresses two different layers, which is why the overall appearance improves even though the tightening does not change.
Who is the combination actually for?
Someone with both laxity and visible pigment. If the only concern is laxity, RF microneedling alone achieves the same tightening and there is no reason to pay for the laser. If the only concern is pigment, the RF component is unnecessary and a picosecond or thulium treatment on its own is the better use of money. The combination earns its place when both problems are genuinely present.
Does combining them increase downtime?
Not notably, according to the comparative work. Both are non-ablative and neither removes tissue, so recovery remains in the range of a few days of redness with light sloughing rather than the week or more that ablative resurfacing requires. That said, two treatments in one session means more total inflammation, and settings are adjusted accordingly.
How strong is the evidence?
Reasonable but not definitive. The comparison was prospective with blinded evaluation, which is meaningful, but the sample was small and the control group was a previously treated cohort rather than patients randomised at the same time. That design leaves room for differences between the groups other than the treatment itself. The direction of the finding is credible; the precise size of the benefit is less certain.
Can RF microneedling tighten skin significantly on its own?
It improves laxity modestly and reliably, and it does not remove skin. Where laxity is mild, that improvement can be genuinely sufficient. Where skin is markedly loose and can be pinched into a distinct fold, no non-surgical device closes that gap, and a series of sessions will disappoint regardless of what is combined with it.
That answer decides whether the combination is worth paying for. Dr. Mortazavi will tell you which you actually have — including when one device does the job.
4667 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 310 — Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 568-7544 — info@plumpmedicalspa.com
Tuesday – Saturday, 10am – 6pm